With Special Packaging, Sagent Gets FDA Approval For Heparin Products

0 comments

Posted on 6th July 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

In a much publicized case, actor Dennis Quaid’s newborn twins were accidentally given heparin overdoses in 2007. He blames the packaging of the drug for the mishap, with 10,000 unit and 10 unit heparin vials looking so similar that nurses confused them.  

Well, a heparin manufacturer has addressed that issue, and Tuesday asserted that its special labeling — with different  colors for each strength of heparin –  helped it to win Food and Drug Administration approval  for nine of its heparin products.
http://www.fiercepharmamanufacturing.com/story/packaging-contributes-approvals-sagents-heparin/2010-07-06

Sagent said it will launch its new heparin products, the heparin sodium injection USP,  immediately. In 2009 U.S. sales of heparin were about 306 million. 
http://www.pharmabiz.com/article/detnews.asp?articleid=56257&sectionid=

“Attaining FDA approval of Sagent’s heparin vials is a major accomplishment for our company,” CEO Jeffrey  Yordon said in a prepared statement. “Amidst the many challenges the nation’s supply of heparin has recently faced, Sagent identified and readied a reliable source for heparin and successfully navigated the FDA approval process for each of our heparin presentations. We believe that our innovative approach to the packaging and labelling of our heparin provides us with a significant advantage in the market by better meeting the requirements of patients and customers, positioning us for a successful launch.”

Sagent’s has proprietary PreventIV Measures packaging and labeling, which aids users in distinguishing between the nine presentations. Sagent’s packaging and labeling for heparin include using of a unique colour for each total strength; easy-to-read drug name, concentration and fill volumes; and cartons printed on all sides.

 PreventIV Measures is Sagent’s name for what it calls its user-driven and patient-centered approach to product labeling and packaging, which considers everyone handling medication along the way in order to help prevent medication errors.

“The pace of hospital care is faster than it has ever been, requiring increased vigilance to reduce treatment errors,”  Elaine Levy, system director for Pharmacy Sharp HealthCare in San Diego, California, said in a prepared statement.

 “Sagent’s PreventIV Measures approach to packaging and labeling design makes it easier to differentiate drugs from others in the same class, even when the medications look or sound alike,” she said. “Further, it makes it easier to distinguish between doses, which is especially important when working with medications like heparin that have a number of concentrations and sizes. I believe that features such as those incorporated into Sagent’s products can help reduce those errors caused by selecting the incorrect medication for a patient.”


PreventIV Measures is Sagent’s comprehensive, user-driven and patient-centred approach to product labelling and packaging that is designed to help prevent medication errors. It incorporates unique label and carton designs, cap and label colours, bar coding and other features that are designed to make it easier to differentiate drugs and identify the correct dose.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Teva, Baxter Acted Out of Corporate Greed, Sparking The Biggest Recorded Hepatitis Outbreak In History

0 comments

Posted on 12th May 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

Last week a Las Vegas jury delivered the largest award ever, $500 million, in the state of Nevada’s history. That’s a very generous verdict, rendered – I think – because the panel believed that two giant drug companies valued their profits much more than the public’s safety.   http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/07/jurors-reach-verdict-over-hepatitis-c-damages/

As I wrote in a blog yesterday, the judgment was awarded in a case where a man in his 60s went to a clinic in 2006 for what should have been a routine colonoscopy. He left with an incurable liver disease, hepatitis C.  

That man, Henry Chanin, and his wife Lorraine won $356 million in punitive damages from Teva Parenteral Medicines and $144 million from Baxter Health Care, the manufacturer and distributor, respectively, of the anesthetic propofol. Teva and Baxter plan to appeal the verdict.

The case raises many questions about corporate responsibility and safety.  Baxter is no strange to such questions. It faces a flood of lawsuits from survivors of people, estimated in the hundreds, who died after getting doses of contaminated heparin, a blood thinner, that was imported to the states from China in 2008. 

Last week’s $500 million verdict is only the beginning for Teva and Baxter. There are dozens of lawsuits stemming from the hepatitis C outbreak pending against the two pharmaceutical giants, but the Chanins’ case was the first to go to trial. After the award in their trial, if I was representing Teva and Baxter, I would advise them to settle those other lawsuits, pronto.  

Patients at several facilities, including the Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center, were exposed to HIV and hepatitis strains C and B when single-dose vials of propofol were used on multiple patients after the vials had been contaminated by nurses reusing syringes on the same patients.

During the opening statements in April for the four-week trial on the Chanins’ lawsuit, attorneys told the jury that Teva and Baxter’s negligent actions sparked the largest recorded hepatitis outbreak in history. http://www.lvrj.com/news/lawer-targets-drug-companies-in-hepatitis-case-opening-statements-91533874.html

 Henry Chanin’s lawyer, Robert Eglet, said that a company called SICOR Pharmaceuticals opted to sell propofol in 20 milliliter and 100-milliter vials in order to boost its production and profits. As a result, SICOR was sold at a premium price, $3.5 billion, to Teva in 2003.

 But there was a problem with the 50-millimeter vials: That large a dose was enough to knock out a 600-pound gorilla, an anesthesiologist testified at the trial. A human would only need to get 10 to 20 milliliters of the drug in order to undergo a colonoscopy.  http://www.lvrj.com/news/doctor-in-endoscopy-trial-testifies-vials-of-sedative-were-too-large-91684569.html

 Rather than throw out the leftover propofol in a vial, medical workers were tempted to re-use the single-use vials, which became contaminated when nurses reused syringes on the same patient.

 ”The pharmaceutical companies were responsible for providing 50 milliliter vials of propofol to ambulatory centers that would require no more than 10 milliliter to 20 milliliter bottles because profit dictated the decision to do so,” Eglet said in a statement after the jury’s verdict. “The larger size vials encouraged multi-dosing becoming weapons of mass infection.”

Teva and Baxter could have remedied the situation. Eglet pointed out that there were 148 reported cases of hepatitis C contamination throughout the U.S. and globally – all before Chanin contracted the disease – and yet Teva and Baxter didn’t take any action. If they had, Chanin would not have the chronic liver disease today. 

It was also unfortunate for those who became infected in Nevada because of “double-dipping” in those large vials.

 Teva and Baxter were acting out of greed, the public be damned. So many, many people because infected in Nevada, all because of nurses “double-dipping” in those large, cost-effective vials.

 Even though the $500 million award is a tidy sum, it’s almost a drop in the bucket to Teva and Baxter, which combined made $13.4 billion last year.

 “The $500 million verdict represents two weeks of income to these companies,” Eglet said. “The jury understood the importance of sending a message to stop putting profit over patient safety and making sure this never happens again.”


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Jury Orders Baxter, Teva to Pay $500 Million In Largest Award in Nevada’s History

0 comments

Posted on 11th May 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , ,

 Baxter Health Care Corp. and Teva Parenteral Medicines were asked to pay a mere $1.7 million to settle a lawsuit filed against them by a Nevada man who contracted hepatitis C after undergoing a routine colonoscopy. The two drug giants ignored the offer, according to Robert Eglet, the plaintiff’s attorney. http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/07/jurors-reach-verdict-over-hepatitis-c-damages/

 Well, hindsight is 20/20, as they say. That’s because last Friday a Clark County District Court jury in Nevada awarded Henry Chanin and his wife a half a billion dollars in punitive damages. Teva was ordered to fork over $356 million and Baxter was hit for $144 million, a whopping $500 million total.

 That’s the largest award in Nevada’s history.

 The Chanins’ complaint against Teva and Baxter alleged product liability, negligence and disregard of known and accepted medical procedures, resulting in Henry Chanin contracting hepatitis C from exposure to contaminated vials of the anesthetic propofol. Baxter was the distributor and Teva the manufacturer of the drug.

 This hepatitis case isn’t the only litigation that Baxter has pending against it. The drug maker also faces a barrage of lawsuits stemming from hundreds of people dying after taking tainted heparin, the blood thinner, that had been imported from China in 2008.

 Both Baxter and Teva said they plan to appeal the $500 million jury verdict in Nevada, which stems from a hepatitis C outbreak two years ago.

 Patients were exposed to HIV and hepatitis strains C and B when single-dose vials of anesthesia medication, propofol, were used on multiple patients.  Nurse anesthetists were re-used syringes to withdraw medication from the single-dose vial, creating a back flow of blood resulting in contamination. http://www.lvrj.com/news/teva-plans-appeal-of-hepatitis-verdict-93223949.html

 Teva maintains that it has done nothing wrong.

 “Teva is reviewing the full judgment and continues to believe that the evidence shows the company acted responsibly,” the drug maker said in a statement.

 “The label for its propofol product clearly states that it is for single patient use only and that aseptic procedures should be used at all times. “ Teva said. “Further, the company believes that the Jury should have been allowed to hear all of the evidence in this case. Teva believes that the evidence clearly showed that if the plaintiff contracted hepatitis as alleged, it was because a properly labeled product was blatantly misused at the clinic in question. Teva believes that there are numerous grounds for appeal, and plans to contest the verdict vigorously.”

 Anywhere from nine to 114 patients were infected with the incurable disease. In addition to Chanin, Eglet represents 40 more patients who contracted hepatitis C and another 4,500 who were among the 50,000 people who had gotten colonoscopies at the Nevada clinic in question and were notified that they needed to be tested. Not the kind of message you ever want to get.

 Chanin’s story is particularly heartbreaking, which is perhaps why the Nevada jury was so generous. He is the headmaster of The Meadows School, a private school founded by Carolyn Goodman, wife of Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman.

 Chanin went to the Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center in June 2006 for a colonoscopy, and in addition to having that routine procedure he contracted hepatitis C.

 During a four-week trial that started April 19, Chanin said that he and his wife had stopped having sexual relations, for fear that he would spread the disease to her.

 ”A $1.7 million offer of judgment to settle was ignored by the defense bringing the Chanin’s to this point,” Eglet said in a press release.

 “At the core of this case is the responsibility of the pharmaceutical companies as well as that of the health care professionals,” he said. “The conduct of the doctors and nurses demonstrated a disregard for human life in the reuse of contaminated vials and syringes. Equally, the pharmaceutical companies were responsible for providing 50 ml vials of propofol to ambulatory centers that would require no more than 10ml to 20 ml bottles because profit dictated the decision to do so. The larger size vials encouraged multi-dosing becoming weapons of mass infection. The result is nearly immeasurable.”

Before Friday’s verdict, Henry and his wife had already been awarded compensatory damages of $3.25 million and $1.85 million, respectively. 

I’ll be writing more about the details of this case, and the significance of the vial sizes, this week.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Chinese Drug Maker Untainted By 2008 Heparin Tragedy Makes Strong Financial Debut

0 comments

Posted on 7th May 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , ,

The world’s largest supplier of heparin products, which is also the only Chinese heparin maker accredited by the Food and Drug Administration, has become a publicly traded company. It got off to such a strong start that its founders have become “overnight” multi-billionaires.  http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/business/global/07drug.html?scp=2&sq=heparin&st=Search

If you believe the claims of Shenzen Hepalink Pharmaceutical, which started trading on the Shenzen stock exchange Thursday, it is one of the few good guys, one of the few Chinese heparin makers with its hands clean, in the tragedy in 2008 when contaminated heparin imported from China was linked to the deaths of hundreds in the United States.

Shenzen Hepalink claims that it not only has accreditation from the FDA, but also from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare.

Officials at Shenzen Hepalink underpriced their initial public offering, as the company’s shares jumped 18.3 percent from the opening price. That put the drug maker’s valuation at $10 billion, and made very rich men of its founders, Li Li and his wife Tan Li.

The New York Times Friday described Shenzen Hepalink’s main product as “highly purified heparin, a substance made from the mucous membranes of pig intestines.”  Heparin is a blood thinner. 

The Times suggested that the reason Shenzen Hepalink’s shares did so well their first day on the market was because the company was guiltless, and never cited, as one of the Chinese companies that provided contaminated heparin to the states. Tainted heparin from 12 Chinese companies was sent to nearly a dozen countries, according to The Times.   

The paper also pointed out that in China, “pig intestines are often cooked in unregulated family workshops.” In 2008, a contaminant called oversulfated chondroitin sulfate was in the tainted heparin, undetected by normal testing.

The Food and Drug Administration has said that there were 149 deaths caused by allergic reactions to the contaminated heparin, according to The Times.

That’s way below our estimate. We believe that hundreds of deaths can be linked to the tainted heparin, and there are hundreds of wrongful-death suits pending in the matter. 

 Here’s a side note to this story. Another investor that did very well with Shenzhen Hepalink’s IPO was beleaguered Goldman Sachs. It paid $4.9 million for a 12.5 percent share in the heparin company back in 2007. That stake is now worth 200 times what Goldman first paid for it, according to Bloomberg News.   

    

 

      

 


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Citing FDA ‘Missteps,’ Congressmen Want Answers To ‘Unsolved Heparin Whodunnit’

0 comments

Posted on 5th May 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , ,

Last week The Wall Street Journal leaked the contents of a blistering letter that two congressmen wrote to the Food and Drug Administration over the agency’s handling of a probe into the exact source of contaminated heparin from China, deadly blood thinner that was linked to hundreds of deaths in 2008.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans put out a press release about the heparin matter last Friday. http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/news/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=7832

And that press release includes a link to a copy of the letter.

U.S. Reps. Joe Barton, R-Texas, ranking member on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Michael Burgess, R-Texas, ranking member of the panel’s Oversight and Investigations subcommittee, didn’t mince words with FDA Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg.

The headline on their press release alone was “Barton, Burgess Reveal FDA Missteps in Unsolved Heparin Whodunnit.”

Then in their 10-page letter, the two lawmakers detailed what their investigation into the heparin tragedy has discovered, basically accusing the FDA of dropping the ball when it didn’t follow up on leads linking Chongqing Imperial and other Chinese drug suppliers to lots of contaminated heparin identified during the 2008 recalls.

“We are very troubled by how FDA has handled the investigation to find out who was responsible for the contaminated heparin,” wrote Barton and Burgess. “The staff has learned that FDA has specific and credible information about certain Chinese heparin firms that warrants further investigation as suspect entities responsible for contaminating the heparin supply.”

Barton, an ardent watchdog on the heparin issue, and Burgess asked Hamburg to provide details about the agency’s strategy regarding the unresolved investigation. And they want to know the FDA plans to do when it identifies manufacturers responsible for producing the contaminated blood thinner.

“Unfortunately, the case of who contaminated the heparin remains unsolved,” the letters says of the tainted blood thinner that killed in 2008, resulting in hundreds of lawsuits.

Barton and Burgess want answers to seven questions from Hamburg by the end of May.

Those questions include:

1.    What is FDA’s strategy for solving the question of who caused the contamination of the heparin supply? Please detail the strategy and when it was developed, the names and positions of the FDA officials who developed the strategy, and the names and positions of the FDA officials responsible for implementing the strategy.

2.    To what extent can FDA conduct a traceability investigation of various heparin supply chains in China on its own without the assistance of the Chinese government?

3.    Assuming FDA could solve the case on its own, what would FDA do with this information?

4.    What actions is FDA taking to follow up on the Chongqing Imperial issues raised in this letter?

5.    Does the FDA agree there is a basis to make another request to the Chinese government about the heparin contamination investigation? If not, why not?

6.    Is the FDA willing to cooperate and even share information with the Chinese government in an effort to solve the heparin contamination case? Would FDA be able to do this under current law and under the current agreement with the SFDA (State Food and Drug Administration)? If not, why not?

7.    Does FDA agree that the contamination of the heparin supply is an international issue? If so, why hasn’t the FDA sought international support from the World Health Organization and/or other countries to get more transparency and cooperation from the Chinese government, or to provide assistance to the Chinese government, in the heparin contamination-source investigation?

 It looks like Hamburg has her work cut out for her in the next few weeks.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Tainted Drywall The Latest Scourge From China

0 comments

Posted on 6th April 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , ,

First, China brought us contaminated heparin. Now, it’s brought us drywall that is endangering American homeowners.

The federal government on Friday warned families with the defective drywall to take it out of their homes, because its noxious emissions are being linked to health and safety problems. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304871704575159971085212294.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5

The drywall, also called gypsum or wallboard, has been connected to electrical problems and causing respiratory problems for residents of new homes, mainly in Louisiana and Florida. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/03/business/03drywall.html?ref=business

Some Chinese-made drywall is emitting hydrogen sulfide at rates 100 times greater than non-Chinese drywall, according to information The Journal cited from the Consumer Product Safety Commission and Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The drywall came under federal investigation after homeowners complained about smelling rotten-egg like sulfide odors. But that’s not all. Homeowners complained that they were suddenly getting bloody noses, headaches and respiratory problems – and that some of their appliances were corroding.

More than 3,000 complaints have been filed with the Consumer Product Safety Commission from people who claim fumes from the drywall have damaged their homes, according to The Journal.

One consulting firm pegged the damage from the faulty drywall at $15 billion to $25 billion. The question now is who will foot the bill.

Some home builders are already fixing homes they built with the defective Chinese drywall. One company, Lennar Group, has budgeted $81 million to fix 600 homes it built in Florida, The Journal reported. Lennar wants to get that money back from insurers and subcontractors.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

The Dangers of Denture Cream, And The Need For Tougher Toxin Laws

0 comments

Posted on 1st April 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

The list of supposedly safe products that prove to be dangerous gets longer and longer every day. The latest instance involves denture cream, of all things. In a New York Times column Wednesday headlined “Weak Rules on Toxins and Safety,” we are told the tragic story of Johnny Howell. The resident of Winston-Salem, N.C., had been using a tube of Polident a week. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/business/economy/31leonhardt.html?ref=economy Now 53-year-old Howell needs a walker and had to quit his job as a mechanic. Another Polident user, Rodney Urbanek, had to start using a walker in 2007 when he was 63. He passed away a year later, from what an autopsy called a copper deficiency caused by zinc overload. A lack of copper leads to brain damage. It appears that for 14 years, until February, GlaxoSmithKline was selling the denture cream Super Polident, which has high levels of zinc. Writer David Leonhardt then goes on to criticize U.S. regulators for the nation’s “weak rules on toxins and consumer safety.” He writes that a Navy dentist back in the 1950s first saw a link between zinc and copper deficiency. “It’s too late to prevent much of whatever damage has been caused by denture cream,” he wrote. “But it is not too late to prevent the next such problem, and there will be a next one.” Congress will consider a bill this year that would revamp regulations regarding toxins. “The chemical industry seems less opposed to a regulatory overhaul, in part because lax regulations may help low-cost Chinese chemical companies more than American firms,” The Times writes. That was certainly the lesson of the heparin contamination disaster where the tainted blood thinner imported from China killed dozens of Americans. It’s high time to tighten the laws.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Heparin Rival Is In A Pickle Over Patent For Angiomax

0 comments

Posted on 19th March 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , ,

The manufacturer of a rival blood-thinner to the generic heparin is trying to overcome what The New York Times Friday called “one of the costliest blunders in drug industry history.” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/19/business/19patent.html

The Times story, headlined “A Company Races to Keep a Drug Patent,” describes the predicament of Parsippany, N.J.-based Medicines Co., which makes the blood thinner Angiomax.

In a clerical error that should have cost someone his or her job, Medicines back in 2001 missed a deadline to apply for a patient extension for Angiomax. So now that patent is set to expire next Tuesday, instead of in December 2014. That means generic versions of the drug will be able to come to market.

The drug maker has filed several appeals with patent officials over its goof, unsuccessfully. But Tuesday a federal judge ruled that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office must reconsider its denial of Medicines’ 2001 filing.

The Times’ story outlines all of Medicines’ machinations to retain its patent on Angiomax. And that includes a convoluted argument by Medicines’ about its blood thinner versus heparin.

The drug makers has studies that maintain that it would save the health care system billions of dollars over the next two decades if Angiomax retains its patent.

Medicines argues that a continued patent would mean more promotion for Angiomax, and possibly new uses for it, according to The Times. So its use would increase at the expense of its main competitor, generic heparin.

Yet Angiomax is much pricier than heparin, at more than $600 a patient, versus pennies for heparin.

“But Medicines argues that Angiomax is actually cheaper for the health care system overall than heparin, partly because it causes less bleeding, a serious and costly side effect,” The Times writes.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Baxter Having Issues Passing New Heparin-Potency Test

0 comments

Posted on 15th March 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

Baxter International, the maker of the blood thinner heparin, says it’s encountering problems having its drug pass a stricter drug-potency test, according to the magazine Modern Healthcare. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20100315/NEWS/303159895

The update that has Baxter troubled has been devised by U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP), and provides potency reading for heparin that are 10 percent greater than the old test.

“It’s taking us a bit longer than anticipated to meet the requirements of the new test,” Baxter spokeswoman Kellie Hotz told Modern Healthcare.

She added that Baxter has been talking to the Food and Drug Administration about way it can meet the new USP standard.

The heparin that is currently being testing is pre-mixed product, not the concentrated vial product that was investigated by the FDA last year, Hotz told Modern Healthcare.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Group Produces Guide Aimed To Prevent Incidents Like The Heparin Contamination Tragedy

0 comments

Posted on 3rd March 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , ,

It’s too bad this wasn’t around in 2008, when Americans were dying after getting tainted heparin from China: a guide that helps drug makers and their suppliers identify risk in the supply chain.
http://www.securingpharma.com/40/articles/395.php

The Pharmaceutical Quality Group (PQG) has put together the guide, which says that globalization and cost-consciousness has made the pharmaceutical supply chain very complex. And that can “reduce both the knowledge and understanding of the exposure to risk.”

The story on the guide notes that it is being published “in the wake of serious incidents in which the integrity of the pharmaceutical supply chain has been compromised to allow substandard and adulterated ingredients to find their way into medicines.”

The example cited: the contamination of the blood thinner heparin made in China in 2007 and 2008, which lead to the deaths of more than 200 people around the world.

The “how-to” guide goes into detail about techniques for managing supply chain risk, and illustrates how these can be applied in the pharma industry, including in instances like the heparin incident.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney